![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parents in Burnaby protest anti-discrimination policyBy Michelle Reid On May 10, 2011 | 0 CommentsThe Burnaby school district is under fire from parents who are concerned about a new inclusive policy whose "objective is to ensure all school community members learn to work together in an atmosphere of respect and safety "free from homophobia, transphobia, antigay harassment and exclusion, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity." It's hard for me to wrap my head around why parents would be protesting a policy that wants to make a school a safer place for children- especially since one of the parents who opposes the policy is aware of the awful fact that trans and queer children are 16 times more likely to commit suicide than their straight, cis-gendered peers. All the same, parents are arguing that teaching tolerance about sexual identities infringes on a parent's right to give moral guidance to their child and that the issues of sexual and gender minorities affect only "a few" students. This is a heartbreaking attitude when you consider that most queer students feel unsafe in schools, many are physically assaulted, and most are verbally assaulted. Parents should support any initiative that seeks to make schools a safer, happier place for all students. The protest and fear of children being "sexualized" or led morally astray speaks volumes about the ignorance and bigoted attitudes of those parents. It isn't enough to say, as many of the parents do, that essentially while they don't "have a problem" with queer and transfolk, they don't want to hear about them in their children's schools. That is, in fact, having a problem with queer and transfolk; it's called homophobia, and their protests are a demonstration of the necessity of having these issues raised thoughtfully in schools. Clearly many children aren't being taught tolerance, respect and understanding at home.
This weekend, Vancouver puts on her finest leather miniskirt for the SlutWalkBy Michelle Reid On May 09, 2011 | 0 Comments
While many are praising SlutWalks for seizing on our zeitgeist of humour-as-political-weapon, I've read a lot of responses to the first SlutWalk that distressed me. Critics are have drawn comparisons that go a lot like, "I wouldn't leave my car unlocked with the windows rolled down in a bad neighbourhood if I didn't want it to get stolen, so don't wear a short skirt if you don't want a man to rape you." This is a bad analogy for a lot of reasons, the least of which is not that my body is not a car.
Vote for Sexual and Reproductive Health Today!By Michelle Reid On May 02, 2011 | 0 Comments
I'm young, female, Aboriginal, and pro-choice, and that's why I voted against Harper. Today, May 2nd, is the general election in Canada. It's hard for me to focus on anything else because the last few weeks have been so inspiring: seeing so many people of all ages come together to challenge voter apathy with insight and innovation. I'm hopeful that today will be a landmark election in Canadian history, one that demonstrates we aren't apathetic about how our country is led. You might know that in the last election, two out of five eligible voters didn't vote; only one in five voted for the current Prime Minister. In comparison, this election saw the highest-ever numbers of advance voting. Why am I talking about the election on That's So Sexy? Because the personal is political, and your sexual health (and choices, and freedom!) are political issues. Stephen Harper has done terrible things for reproductive and sexual health while in office, many that directly impact Canadian women everywhere.
Tag(s): Feminism, Gender, health promotion, HPV, Sexual Health, Sexuality Rights, Social Justice, Youth
<<First <Prev 1 Next> Last>>
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||